Friday 3 October 2014

Paper on assessment of conscious states


How can we tell whether an immobiised patient is conscious or not? This was the starting point for the master thesis of three clinical psychology students that I supervised. The students reviewed and provided a synthesis of the recent scientific literature on the subject. After the thesis work was over and the students had left the university for clinical positions, I collaborated with them to rewrite the work into a article intended for Norwegian clinicians.

Table 1:
STATE OF  CONSCIOUSNESSWAKEFULLNESSAWARENESSINTENTIONAL BEHAVIOUR
Normal awake stateYesYesYes
unresponsive wakefulness syndromeYesNoNo
Minimally conscious stateYesOccasionallySome
Locked-in-syndromeYesYesVery limited motor capacity
ComaNoNoNo

The paper gives a definition of consciousness and outlines the clinical disorders of consciousness (see table 1 above). We then categorise four different types of assessment of consciousness: behaviour checklists, electrophysiology, imaging of activation and imaging of networks. We discuss each approach's standing, merits and disadvantages (table 2). Finally we discuss to which extent the assessment approaches reflect the theoretical definition.

Table 2:
APPROACHTYPEEXAMPLESPRINCIPLEADVANTAGESDISADVATAGES
Behaviour checklistActive or passiveGCS-R, SMART, etc., see Seel et al. (2010) for reviewChecklist for whether actions occur, spontaneously or on instructionHas clinical standardUnable to capture consciousness that does not appear in the behavior
Electro-physiologyActive or passiveEEG, ERPElectrodes measure simultaneous fireing of groups of neuronsEquipment readily available can be used on all patients, also at bedsideHard to say where the signal comes from, hard to say which processing the response involves
Imaging of brain activityActivefMRI, PETImaging of the metabolism from activity in different parts of the brainGood localization of the signal, can determine whether a task activates the same areas as in healthy peopleExpensive and scarce equipment, cannot be applied to all patients. Measures the capacity for consciousness, but this capacity is not necessarily in use
Imaging of networksPassiveDefault mode network, DTIMeasures which parts of the brain that are connected, or that are activated simultaneouslyAs above, but does not require active participation from the patientAs above, but in addition it is unclear how the networks should be interpreted

As we wanted to inform Norwegian clinicians working in adjacent fields and next-of-kin to patients with consciousness afflictions, we wanted the paper to be easily accessible. We published in a peer-reviewed Norwegian online open-access journal (abstract in English)

Link to the publication in psykologisk.no (Scandinavian Psychologist).

No comments: