In 2013, our research group "Operational psychology research group" and associated members collaborated on an edited book called "Motivating for safety". The book was intended for practitioners in the industry, in particular captains and safety officers in the maritime field. The book covered topics such as safety climate, sleep deprivation, shared mental models, situation awareness, leadership, psychological capital and hardiness. Each topic is illustrated with cases, exercises and training questions. My chapter on situation awareness is linked below.
Motivating for safety - Chapter 6 - Seeing, understanding, anticipating - Situation awareness as a requirement for safe voyages
Monday, 20 October 2014
Friday, 17 October 2014
Trial lecture on the psychology of risk
In the process of applying for a associate professor position in cognitive psychology, I was asked to deliver a lecture on my own research. Rather than talking about my previous research on the neurocognition of selective attention, I chose to focus the presentation around different research projects I've had on the topic of "risk".
I started out with an example I sometimes use in my lectures to demonstrate the various risks that are relevant to their age group in Norway. I then introduced some classic studies on risk, and some fundamental perspectives. I presented my recent series of Go/NoGo lab experiments intended to model risk perception. I then introduced "situation awareness" as an application of risk in real-word settings, and the related research projects I've run to attempt to approach it in surveys, lab and field experiments. Finally, I discussed some of the consequences of risk, showing how people's behaviour are sometimes changed after considering dangerous situations. Relevant to this, I presented three experiments done in collaboration with Hallgeir Sjåstad, where presenting a threat influenced how security policy was evaluated by a post-Utøya sample.
I started out with an example I sometimes use in my lectures to demonstrate the various risks that are relevant to their age group in Norway. I then introduced some classic studies on risk, and some fundamental perspectives. I presented my recent series of Go/NoGo lab experiments intended to model risk perception. I then introduced "situation awareness" as an application of risk in real-word settings, and the related research projects I've run to attempt to approach it in surveys, lab and field experiments. Finally, I discussed some of the consequences of risk, showing how people's behaviour are sometimes changed after considering dangerous situations. Relevant to this, I presented three experiments done in collaboration with Hallgeir Sjåstad, where presenting a threat influenced how security policy was evaluated by a post-Utøya sample.
Trial lecture on "Human factors"
After applying for a position in work and organizational psychology, I was asked to give a trial lecture to the relevant faculty members. The prescribed topic was "Current perspectives in work and organizational psychology". Some of my research interests were in the field of "human factors", and as this topic was not well represented in the present teaching load of the department, my aim was to demonstrate what "human factors" is, and how it relates to other fields of psychology and should be considered a part of work and organizational psychology. I covered the field's history, some general themes, research approaches and applications.
Friday, 3 October 2014
Paper on assessment of conscious states
How can we tell whether an immobiised patient is conscious or not? This was the starting point for the master thesis of three clinical psychology students that I supervised. The students reviewed and provided a synthesis of the recent scientific literature on the subject. After the thesis work was over and the students had left the university for clinical positions, I collaborated with them to rewrite the work into a article intended for Norwegian clinicians.
Table 1:
STATE OF CONSCIOUSNESS | WAKEFULLNESS | AWARENESS | INTENTIONAL BEHAVIOUR |
---|---|---|---|
Normal awake state | Yes | Yes | Yes |
unresponsive wakefulness syndrome | Yes | No | No |
Minimally conscious state | Yes | Occasionally | Some |
Locked-in-syndrome | Yes | Yes | Very limited motor capacity |
Coma | No | No | No |
The paper gives a definition of consciousness and outlines the clinical disorders of consciousness (see table 1 above). We then categorise four different types of assessment of consciousness: behaviour checklists, electrophysiology, imaging of activation and imaging of networks. We discuss each approach's standing, merits and disadvantages (table 2). Finally we discuss to which extent the assessment approaches reflect the theoretical definition.
Table 2:
APPROACH | TYPE | EXAMPLES | PRINCIPLE | ADVANTAGES | DISADVATAGES |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Behaviour checklist | Active or passive | GCS-R, SMART, etc., see Seel et al. (2010) for review | Checklist for whether actions occur, spontaneously or on instruction | Has clinical standard | Unable to capture consciousness that does not appear in the behavior |
Electro-physiology | Active or passive | EEG, ERP | Electrodes measure simultaneous fireing of groups of neurons | Equipment readily available can be used on all patients, also at bedside | Hard to say where the signal comes from, hard to say which processing the response involves |
Imaging of brain activity | Active | fMRI, PET | Imaging of the metabolism from activity in different parts of the brain | Good localization of the signal, can determine whether a task activates the same areas as in healthy people | Expensive and scarce equipment, cannot be applied to all patients. Measures the capacity for consciousness, but this capacity is not necessarily in use |
Imaging of networks | Passive | Default mode network, DTI | Measures which parts of the brain that are connected, or that are activated simultaneously | As above, but does not require active participation from the patient | As above, but in addition it is unclear how the networks should be interpreted |
As we wanted to inform Norwegian clinicians working in adjacent fields and next-of-kin to patients with consciousness afflictions, we wanted the paper to be easily accessible. We published in a peer-reviewed Norwegian online open-access journal (abstract in English)
Link to the publication in psykologisk.no (Scandinavian Psychologist).
Labels:
Clinical,
Cognitive neuroscience,
Norwegian,
Publications
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)